It struck me as strange in last night’s presidential debate that in 2002–just a decade ago–Mitt Romney knew so few “qualified women” for state government in Massachusettes, he had to go out and search them out, resulting in “binders full of women” from which he appointed a record number of women.

“We took a concerted effort” to find women and “went to women’s groups” to find candidates, Romney said.

It struck lots of people as strange, including the women’s group in Massachusettes who is speaking out today–noting they had to push Romney to appoint women; that they brought him the binders full of women, he didn’t come to them; that they watched him initially appoint some women, but then saw his commitment to women drop off during his 4 year-term. As Carol Hardy-Fanta, former co-chair of MassGAP’s higher education subcommittee told Huffington Post, “Our conclusion was, you have to hold his feet to the fire year after year.”

Boston Phoenix journalist David Bernstein weighed in today at Salon.com, affirming it was the women who went to Romney–Romney didn’t go to the women.

And the Boston Globe is reporting that one reason Romney didn’t know qualified women is that he hadn’t sought them out at Bain Capital, where only a handful of women were among the 99 vice presidents–all the rest being white males. The Globe said Romney “did not have a history of appointing women to high level positions” at Bain Capital.

The Huffington Post’s story is entitled “Romney’s ‘Binder Full of Women’ Female Hiring Boast Falls Apart.”